Now with ultraviolent zombie mayhem
Mar. 25th, 2010 06:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Was recently just telling someone that I can't bring myself to overlook incorrect dialogue punctuation or blatant misspellings, no matter how popular or well-recced a fic is, though I vaguely recall a time when stuff like that didn't bother me as much (misuse of your/you're, however, has always, always felt like a sucker-punch to the soul); I think this may be due to doing the submission queue at FIA for a few years now, and now that I'm a lot more finely attuned to catching SpaG mistakes I see them everywhere. Which is much worse when it's an actual, published book rather than a fic.
Which brings me to:
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
I was already predisposed to enjoy this book because a) Pride and Prejudice, classic, and b) who doesn't like a little zombie action every now and then?
It was a fairly entertaining book, though I don't think I'd read it again in a hurry. The zombie-related bits are actually inserted into the original text pretty seamlessly, and some parts are laugh-out-loud funny and others totally gross (which seems on par with what you'd expect of zombies in general), but nothing actually happens with them for the most part; they feature in the background, mostly, and have no real story arc of their own, which gives rise to a lot of questions as to why they're there and how they should be dealt with. Also, most of the fun stuff happens in the first half of the book, leaving the zombies as dead weight for the rest of it, especially after the novelty factor wears thin after a while.
My biggest problem with the book, though, was the shoddy proofreading work done with the new scenes (which was probably apparent, given the way I started this post). There is a constant mix of American and British spelling, confusion with place names and egregious spelling errors, like bails of hay and a coy pond. A COY POND. COME ON! [/Gob Bluth]
To sum up: Borrow it from the library and read it for a few laughs, though you might be left wanting to read the original instead. (Or, if you're me, wondering where to send a letter of complaint about the coy pond.)
Which brings me to:
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
I was already predisposed to enjoy this book because a) Pride and Prejudice, classic, and b) who doesn't like a little zombie action every now and then?
It was a fairly entertaining book, though I don't think I'd read it again in a hurry. The zombie-related bits are actually inserted into the original text pretty seamlessly, and some parts are laugh-out-loud funny and others totally gross (which seems on par with what you'd expect of zombies in general), but nothing actually happens with them for the most part; they feature in the background, mostly, and have no real story arc of their own, which gives rise to a lot of questions as to why they're there and how they should be dealt with. Also, most of the fun stuff happens in the first half of the book, leaving the zombies as dead weight for the rest of it, especially after the novelty factor wears thin after a while.
My biggest problem with the book, though, was the shoddy proofreading work done with the new scenes (which was probably apparent, given the way I started this post). There is a constant mix of American and British spelling, confusion with place names and egregious spelling errors, like bails of hay and a coy pond. A COY POND. COME ON! [/Gob Bluth]
To sum up: Borrow it from the library and read it for a few laughs, though you might be left wanting to read the original instead. (Or, if you're me, wondering where to send a letter of complaint about the coy pond.)
no subject
on 2010-03-26 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-26 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-26 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-26 02:24 am (UTC)Well, the saving grace is that about 90% of it is original Austen, so you know you're getting that much quality, at least! And I think the "coy pond" was really the worst of it (and also the insistence of referring to sweat as "exercise moisture"); the other stuff was mostly minor enough that it didn't ping my "WHERE IS YOUR BETA?" reflex too often :)
no subject
on 2010-03-26 03:00 am (UTC)As for those bails of hay, I've always known those scoundrels would head straight for the border the minute they were unstrung.
no subject
on 2010-03-26 03:35 am (UTC)Of course, with the forward ponds at least you know where you stand. Those coy ones are always giving off mixed signals.
no subject
on 2010-03-26 04:04 am (UTC)I'm not a fan of errors in fanfic either, but usually if it's the odd one here or there I don't really care. Afterall, these are not professional by any stretch of the imagination.
But DUDE....when it comes to published books, I can't handle it at ALL. And I most definitely will and HAVE stopped reading a book if I notice a lot of spelling/grammatical errors in it. It completely and absolutely turns me off. I'm 100% positive that I refused to keep reading a book some time in the last couple of years for that exact reason, though I can't for the life of me remember which book it is.
Anyway, for someone who claims to love to read a lot (and I really, genuinely do), I haven't read like ANY of the classics. I've never read Pride & Prejudice before, so I'm thinking I should probably read that first. Though if you say the whole zombie aspect of it just seems like it was thrown in there for cheap thrills, then I'm not really sure what the point of reading this book is. I, personally, would want them to have some sort of story arc. Otherwise, what the hell is their purpose in the story?
Anywho, I end this comment by saying: GOB!!! (And I need more AD icons, I really do! OMG, we should totally do an AD marathon when we hang out *nods* :D It'd be EPIC! That and Futurama! And Merlin too, I suppose, LOL ;) *starts plotting*)
(And clearly I did not go to write, like I said. I came back to my addition -- LJ ;) Night!)
no subject
on 2010-03-26 05:23 am (UTC)Like
HEE, I am so up for doing a marathon of any of those shows with you! And then you can teach me how to play D&D. Yay! :D
no subject
on 2010-03-26 02:10 pm (UTC)Mind you, I am a trained proof-reader so I would hope to spot most errors myself...!
no subject
on 2010-03-26 06:16 pm (UTC)Also, I'd be happy to beta for you if you ever need it :)
no subject
on 2010-03-26 06:53 am (UTC)Bad SpaG is a nightmare, ESPECIALLY IN A BOOK!
no subject
on 2010-03-26 06:18 pm (UTC)IKR? Fanfic is one thing, but with books people are PAID to pay attention to these things.
no subject
on 2010-03-26 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-26 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-26 01:30 pm (UTC)The your/you're mistake has always hit me like that, too.
no subject
on 2010-03-26 06:26 pm (UTC)*draws hearts around your icon*
no subject
on 2010-03-26 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-26 06:36 pm (UTC)Honestly, I don't think you'd be missing a whole lot if you didn't read P&P&Z. I'm going to give Sense & Sensibility & Sea Monsters a shot, though, since it has a different author and
no subject
on 2010-03-31 11:47 am (UTC)I too have found my tolerance for typos diminishing over the last few years. The one that gets me hopping up and down in fury and moving away from the computer before I send scathing comments, is people trusting the spell check above everything and ending up with the wrong word for the context (like discreet/discrete).
As far as stuff I've read goes, my nomination for the Where On Earth Was The Editor Award is one of the Dark Hunter books by Sherrilyn Kenyon, in which the demon Kimi "literally inhaled" her plate of food in about 10 seconds. Literally, huh? She breathed it in? Her biology allows for absorption and digestion of food through the lungs? OK...
no subject
on 2010-03-31 07:03 pm (UTC)As for the all-mighty spellcheck, oh dear. The one gets me is when a young lady applies 'rogue' to her cheeks. HA.